Group Think

1 min readOct 29, 2019

On the “Solving Interesting Problems” episode of Akimbo podcast, Seth Godin said, “Interesting problems are solved by groups”.

I couldn’t agree more (the “but” comes later). Seth even cites the example of people who seem to solve problems by themselves: scientists.

Scientists’ work may be conducted in a solitary way, but it relies on the work of a larger group — the other scientists who provided scientific building blocks. One scientist won’t have found a cure for cancer; 10’s of thousands will have.

Peer review encodes group participation into problem-solving.

But… before peer review, the work is solitary.

For me this is how it goes: the more time spent alone, the better the solution.

This might be just me — maybe what I do (marketing for tech firms) requires activities that are foolish to delegate or which can’t be done by a group. A few examples:

  • Gauging the emotional state of a prospective “user” of a product
  • Evaluating demographic data for patterns
  • Writing something persuasive to a particular individual

That’s all individual work.

Of course, there’s immense value (ie valuable ideas) to the “peer review” process, to exposing one’s work up to a group.

But meanwhile, in marketing tech solutions at least, valuable ideas come from individual labor, more so than the group.

What about in your work?

(Republished from




amateur tweets, professional works –pressfield